From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Laplant

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Jul 12, 2005
File No. 2:99 CR 35 (D. Vt. Jul. 12, 2005)

Opinion

File No. 2:99 CR 35.

July 12, 2005


ORDER


The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed January 14, 2005. After careful review of the file and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, no objections having been filed by any party, this Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's recommendations in full for the reasons stated in the Report.

A district judge must make a de novo determination of those portions of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation to which an objection is made. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1); Perez-Rubio v. Wyckoff, 718 F.Supp. 217, 227 (S.D.N.Y. 1989). The district judge may "accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the magistrate's proposed findings and recommendations." Id.

The petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is GRANTED. It is also ordered that the goverment's request for alternative relief is GRANTED, and the Court hereby orders the Probation Department to prepare a revised pre-sentence report prior to resentencing. Also, LaPlant's motion for appointment of counsel (Paper 42) is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Laplant

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Jul 12, 2005
File No. 2:99 CR 35 (D. Vt. Jul. 12, 2005)
Case details for

U.S. v. Laplant

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. TRAVIS LAPLANT

Court:United States District Court, D. Vermont

Date published: Jul 12, 2005

Citations

File No. 2:99 CR 35 (D. Vt. Jul. 12, 2005)