Opinion
No. 04 Cr. 965-01 (RWS).
September 26, 2005
SENTENCING OPINION
Defendant Jessica Lamboy ("Lamboy") has pleaded guilty to conspiracy to convert federal funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (a Class D felony) and theft of federal funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641 (a Class C felony). Lamboy will be sentenced to three years of probation, subject to the further conditions set forth herein.
Prior Proceedings
On September 8, 2004, an indictment was filed charging Lamboy with one count of conspiracy to convert federal funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and one count of theft of federal funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641. An arrest warrant was executed on September 28, 2004, and on that same day, Lamboy was arrested for alleged participation in a conspiracy to convert federal funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and for alleged theft of federal funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641. She was released on her own recognizance on that date. On or about December 3, 2004, Lamboy and the Government entered into a written, non-binding, plea agreement. On December 3, 2004, Lamboy appeared before the Honorable Debra C. Freeman in the Southern District of New York and allocuted to the criminal conduct charged in the indictment. On January 25, 2005, the Honorable Robert W. Sweet accepted Lamboy's guilty plea. Lamboy is scheduled to be sentenced on September 26, 2005.
The Sentencing Framework
In accordance with the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005) and the Second Circuit's decision in United States v. Crosby, 2005 WL 240916 (2d Cir. Feb. 2, 2005), the sentence to be imposed was reached through consideration of all of the factors identified in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), including the advisory Sentencing Guidelines (the "Guidelines") establishing by the United States Sentencing Commission. Thus, the sentence to be imposed here is the result of a consideration of:
(1) the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant;
(2) the need for the sentence imposed —
(A) to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, and to provide just punishment for the offense;
(B) to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct;
(C) to protect the public from further crimes of the defendant; and
(D) to provide the defendant with needed educational or vocational training, medical care, or other correctional treatment in the most effective manner;
(3) the kinds of sentences available;
(4) the kinds of sentence and the sentencing range established for —
(A) the applicable category of offense committed by the applicable category of defendant as set forth in the guidelines . . .;
(5) any pertinent policy statement . . . [issued by the Sentencing Commission];
(6) the need to avoid unwarranted sentence disparities among defendants with similar records who have been found guilty of similar conduct; and
(7) the need to provide restitution to any victims of the offense.18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). A sentencing judge is permitted to find all the facts appropriate for determining a sentence, whether that sentence is a so-called Guidelines sentence or not. See Crosby, 2005 WL 240916, at *7.
The Defendant
Lamboy was born on December 25, 1983 in Brooklyn, New York. She reports that her father lives with his mother in Brooklyn, is unemployed, and abuses heroin. Lamboy sees him approximately once per year. Her mother resides in Aguadilla, Puerto Rico and is reportedly addicted to "crack" cocaine.
Both of Ms. Lamboy's parents were drug-addicted, and she was alternatively raised by her maternal and paternal grandmothers and neighbors. During her teenage years, she frequently went to the home of Adel Najjar ("Najjar") home in order to be cared for, and she became close friends with the Najjar family. Later she became the girlfriend of Najjar's son, George Ruiz. She had very little family support during her teenage years, and remained in close contact with Ruiz and his family during this time.
Lamboy is unmarried and has no children. Lamboy was diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder when she was approximately fifteen or sixteen. She stated that she tried alcohol once when she was seventeen. She has never tried any form of controlled substance and has never received nor required treatment for alcohol use.
Lamboy works part-time in the kitchen at a hospital and earns a modest income.
The Offense Conduct
In June 2002, Lamboy applied for Section 8 housing assistance benefits to reside in an apartment in Queens, New York owned by Najjar. In March 2003, Najjar entered a Housing Assistance Payments Contract for Section 8 tenant-based assistance with the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, to receive Section 8 housing assistance benefits for Lamboy to reside at Najjar's home. From July 2003 through August 2004, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development through the New York City Housing Authority in Manhattan, paid Najjar Section 8 housing benefits for Lamboy to reside in the Section 8 apartment, when Lamboy and Najjar both knew that Lamboy actually resided elsewhere. As a result, Lamboy and Najjar received approximately $9,939 in United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Section 8 housing assistance benefits to which they were not entitled.
Relevant Statutory Provisions
The maximum term of imprisonment under Count 1 is five years. See 18 U.S.C. § 371. Under Count 2 the maximum term of imprisonment that may be imposed is ten years. See 18 U.S.C. § 641. If terms of imprisonment are imposed for Counts 1 and 2, terms of supervised release of not more than three years may also be imposed. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(b)(2). Such terms of supervised release run concurrently. See 18 U.S.C. § 3624(e). The defendant is eligible for probation not less than one nor more than five years' probation per count. See 18 U.S.C. § 3561(c)(1). Because the offense is a felony, one of the following must be imposed as a condition of probation unless extraordinary circumstances exist: a fine, restitution, or community service. See 18 U.S.C. § 3563(a)(2).
Full restitution to the victim is required under 18 U.S.C. § 3663A and 18 U.S.C. § 3664.
The Guidelines
The November 1, 2004 edition of the United States Sentencing Commission Guidelines Manual ("the Guidelines") has been used in this case for calculation purposes, in accordance with Guidelines § 1B1.11(b)(1).
Counts 1 and 2 are grouped together pursuant to § 3D.2(d) because the offense level is determined largely on the basis of the total amount of loss. The guideline for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641 is found in § 2B1.1(a)(2), which provides for a base offense level of six pursuant to § 2B1.1(a)(2). Because the amount of loss caused by Lamboy's actions is $9,939, which exceeds $5,000 but is less than $10,000, the offense level is increased by two levels, pursuant to § 2B1.1(b)(1)(B).
Based on her plea allocution, Lamboy has shown recognition of responsibility for her offense. Therefore her offense level is reduced two levels. See § 3E1.1(a).
The resulting adjusted offense level is six. Lamboy has no prior conviction, resulting in no criminal history points. Therefore, she has no criminal history points and a resulting Criminal History Category of I.
Based on a total offense level of six and a Criminal History Category of I, the Guidelines range for imprisonment is zero to six months. The guideline range for a term of supervised release is two to three years. See § 5D1.2(a)(2). If a sentence of imprisonment of one year or less is imposed, a term of supervised release is not required, but is optional, pursuant to § 5D1.1(b). Supervised release is required if the Court imposes a term of imprisonment of more than one year or when required by statute. See § 5D1.1(a).
Lamboy is eligible for probation because the applicable guideline range is in Zone A of the Sentencing Table, pursuant to § 5B1.1(a)(1).
The maximum fine for Counts 1 and 2 is $250,000 per count. See 18 U.S.C. § 3571. A special assessment of $100 per count is mandatory. See 18 U.S.C. § 3013. The fine range for the instant offense is from $500 to $5,000. See § 5E1.2(c)(3)(A) and (c)(4).
Pursuant to § 5E1.1(a)(1), in the case of an identifiable victim, the Court shall enter a restitution order for the full amount of the victim's loss if such order is authorized under 18 U.S.C. § 3663A.
The Remaining Factors of Section 3553(a)
Having considered the Guidelines calculations, as set forth above, this Court also gives due consideration to the remaining factors identified in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). In particular, pursuant to §§ 3553(a)(1) and 3553(a)(2)(C), it is significant that the instant offense represents Lamboy's only criminal conviction, and she appears to pose no threat to the safety of the community.
The Sentence
No term of imprisonment and no term of supervised release shall be imposed.
A term of three years of probation shall be imposed. As mandatory conditions of this probation, Lamboy shall: (1) not commit another federal, state, or local crime; (2) not illegally possess a controlled substance; (3) not possess a firearm or destructive device; and (4) cooperate in the collection of DNA as directed by the probation officer.
The standard conditions of supervision (1-13) are also recommended, and Lamboy shall report to the nearest Probation Office within 72 hours of release from custody.
Lamboy shall make restitution of $9,939.00 to the New York City Housing Authority, except that no further payment shall be required after the sum of the amounts actually paid by all defendants has fully covered the compensable injury. Restitution in this amount should be made payable to the Clerk of the Court of the Southern District of New York, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY, attn.: Cashier's Office, to be disbursed to the New York City Housing Authority, Office of the Inspector General, 250 Broadway, Suite 2800, New York, NY 10007, attn.: Steven Gruberger.
The restitution shall me paid in monthly installments of at least $140 over a period of supervision to commence 30 days after the date of the judgment.
Lamboy shall notify the United States Attorney for this district within 30 days of any change of mailing or residenct address that occurs while any portion of the restitution remains unpaid.
Due to Lamboy's inability to pay a fine, the fine in this case is waived.
Lamboy is a good candidate for voluntary surrender. She has kept all court appearances and has been in compliance with all terms and conditions of his pretrial release. She is not viewed as a flight risk or a danger to the community.
In addition to the above, Lamboy shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $200, which shall be due immediately.
It is so ordered.