From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Kropf

United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division
Apr 6, 2007
No. CR06-3069-MWB (N.D. Iowa Apr. 6, 2007)

Opinion

No. CR06-3069-MWB.

April 6, 2007


ORDER CONCERNING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING DEFENDANT'S GUILTY PLEA


I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

In an indictment returned on December 6, 2006, defendant Vickie Kropf is charged with perjury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623. On March 23, 2007, defendant appeared before Chief United States Magistrate Judge Paul A. Zoss and entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the indictment. On this same date, Chief Judge Zoss filed a Report and Recommendation in which he recommends that defendant's guilty plea be accepted. No objections to Chief Judge Zoss's Report and Recommendation were filed. The court, therefore, undertakes the necessary review of Chief Judge Zoss's recommendation to accept defendant's plea in this case.

II. ANALYSIS

Pursuant to statute, this court's standard of review for a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is as follows:

A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made. A judge of the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate [judge].
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Similarly, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) provides for review of a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation on dispositive motions and prisoner petitions, where objections are made, as follows:

The district judge to whom the case is assigned shall make a de novo determination upon the record, or after additional evidence, of any portion of the magistrate judge's disposition to which specific written objection has been made in accordance with this rule. The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended decision, receive further evidence, or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.

FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b).

In this case, no objections have been filed, and it appears to the court upon review of Judge Zoss's findings and conclusions, that there is no ground to reject or modify them. Therefore, the court accepts Chief Judge Zoss's Report and Recommendation of March 22, 2007, and accepts defendant's plea of guilty in this case to Count 1 of the indictment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Kropf

United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division
Apr 6, 2007
No. CR06-3069-MWB (N.D. Iowa Apr. 6, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Kropf

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. VICKIE KROPF, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division

Date published: Apr 6, 2007

Citations

No. CR06-3069-MWB (N.D. Iowa Apr. 6, 2007)