From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Kitsopoulous

United States District Court, D. South Dakota, Southern Division
Feb 4, 2007
CIV 06-4186 (D.S.D. Feb. 4, 2007)

Opinion

CIV 06-4186.

February 4, 2007


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Application for Entry of Default, Doc. 5, which was filed on November 6, 2006. Defendant filed an Affidavit on November 22, 2006, stating he was not aware he was allowed to answer the complaint, but after seeking legal advice he desires to answer the complaint and proceed on the merits. The Eighth Circuit recognizes that even in a situation where a default has been entered by the Clerk, "it is likely that a party who promptly attacks an entry of default, rather than waiting for grant of a default judgment, was guilty of an oversight and wishes to defend the case on the merits." Johnson, 140 F.3d at 784. In this case, Defendant did not wait until entry of default before informing the Court he wishes to defend the case on the merits. An Answer having been filed promptly after Plaintiff's application was filed, the Court will deny the application and enter a separate scheduling order. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application for Entry of Default, Doc. 5 is denied.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Kitsopoulous

United States District Court, D. South Dakota, Southern Division
Feb 4, 2007
CIV 06-4186 (D.S.D. Feb. 4, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Kitsopoulous

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOHN ODESAS KITSOPOULOUS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. South Dakota, Southern Division

Date published: Feb 4, 2007

Citations

CIV 06-4186 (D.S.D. Feb. 4, 2007)