Opinion
C/A No.: 8:01-668-02.
April 10, 2008
ORDER (Written Opinion)
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Order for Sentence Reduction
This matter comes before the Court on the defendant's motion for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission (the Commission) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u).
Background
The defendant's motion is based on Amendment 706 to the United States Sentencing Guideline (U.S.S.G.) § 2D1.1(c). This amendment adjusts the base offense level assigned to each threshold quantity of cocaine base, or "crack cocaine," downward by two levels. U.S.S.G. App. C, Amend. 706 (Nov. 1, 2007). On December 11, 2007, the Commission voted to add this amendment to the list of amendments in U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(c) that may be applied retroactively. As this amendment became effective on March 3, 2008, this matter is now ready for disposition.
Discussion
The defendant was last sentenced on January 25, 2006, with the following sentencing range:29 III 120-135
Total Offense Level: Criminal History Category: Months Imprisonment: The Court sentenced the defendant to 120 months imprisonment, the mandatory minimum for his crime. The defendant's sentence was not reduced pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1, Rule 35, or a variance under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and it was rendered after the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005).After taking into account the amendments to §§ 1B.10 2D1.10, the Court finds that the amended sentencing range should be:27 III 120
Total Offense Level: Criminal History Category: Months Imprisonment:The statutory minimum is still 120 months. This Court will not consider any guideline decision from the previous sentencing that was unaffected by the recent amendment. U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(b)(1).
Conclusion
Having calculated and considered the revised sentencing guidelines, specifically the provisions of §§ 2D1.1(c) and 1B1.10, effective March 3, 2008, and having also considered the relevant statutory sentencing factors contained in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and the advisory nature of the Sentencing Guidelines, the defendant's motion is DENIED because his current sentence is the mandatory minimum for his crime.
IT IS THEREFORE SO ORDERED THAT the defendant's motion be DENIED.