From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Johnson

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Nov 15, 2007
8:07CR347 (D. Neb. Nov. 15, 2007)

Opinion

8:07CR347.

November 15, 2007


ORDER


This matter is before the court on defendant's unopposed MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PRETRIAL MOTIONS [16]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The defendant will be given the requested approximate 7-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by November 21, 2007.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Defendant's MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PRETRIAL MOTIONS [16] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before November 21, 2007.

2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between November 14, 2007 and November 21, 2007, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel required additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) (B).


Summaries of

U.S. v. Johnson

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Nov 15, 2007
8:07CR347 (D. Neb. Nov. 15, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD JOHNSON, JR., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Nov 15, 2007

Citations

8:07CR347 (D. Neb. Nov. 15, 2007)