From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Jahn

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 7, 2001
11 F. App'x 951 (9th Cir. 2001)

Summary

holding that, where defamation claim was based on assertions that the statements were made as part of a conspiracy to have employee fired, all claims derived from a common nucleus of operative fact

Summary of this case from Camillo v. Campbell Clinic, P.C.

Opinion


11 Fed.Appx. 951 (9th Cir. 2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott Stephen JAHN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 00-50156. D.C. No. CR-99-00164-H. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 7, 2001

Argued and Submitted February 12, 2001.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court Southern District of California, Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge, Presiding.

Before FERGUSON, TASHIMA, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The joint request to dismiss this appeal filed May 31, 2001 is GRANTED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Jahn

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 7, 2001
11 F. App'x 951 (9th Cir. 2001)

holding that, where defamation claim was based on assertions that the statements were made as part of a conspiracy to have employee fired, all claims derived from a common nucleus of operative fact

Summary of this case from Camillo v. Campbell Clinic, P.C.
Case details for

U.S. v. Jahn

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott Stephen JAHN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 7, 2001

Citations

11 F. App'x 951 (9th Cir. 2001)

Citing Cases

Kim v. City of Sunnyside

Additionally, because Plaintiff alleges state law claims arising from “a common nucleus of operative facts,”…

Camillo v. Campbell Clinic, P.C.

Although Olinger asserts without argument that "Plaintiff's allegations against Dr. Olinger are distinct from…