From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Jackson

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 27, 2010
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 03-0642, CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-5255 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 27, 2010)

Summary

rejecting the petitioner's ineffective assistance of counsel claim where he maintained innocence throughout the proceedings and the record did not demonstrate that he would have accepted a guilty plea

Summary of this case from United States v. Kismat

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 03-0642, CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-5255.

April 27, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, on this 27th day of April, 2010, for the reasons stated in the foregoing Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner Anthony Jackson's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence (Docket No. 144) is DENIED without a hearing. The Court finds no ground upon which to issue a certificate of appeal.

The Clerk is directed to close this case.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Jackson

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 27, 2010
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 03-0642, CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-5255 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 27, 2010)

rejecting the petitioner's ineffective assistance of counsel claim where he maintained innocence throughout the proceedings and the record did not demonstrate that he would have accepted a guilty plea

Summary of this case from United States v. Kismat

rejecting the petitioner's ineffective assistance of counsel claim where the petitioner maintained innocence throughout the proceedings and the record did not demonstrate that he would have accepted a guilty plea

Summary of this case from United States v. Livingston
Case details for

U.S. v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent, v. ANTHONY JACKSON Petitioner

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 27, 2010

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 03-0642, CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-5255 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 27, 2010)

Citing Cases

United States v. Livingston

District courts in this circuit have applied this reasoning and rejected ineffective assistance of counsel…

United States v. Kismat

District courts in this circuit have applied this reasoning and rejected ineffective assistance of counsel…