From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Hubbard

United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Cedar Rapids Division
Jun 21, 2010
No. 94-CR-19-LRR (N.D. Iowa Jun. 21, 2010)

Opinion

No. 94-CR-19-LRR.

June 21, 2010


ORDER


The matter before the court is United States Magistrate Judge Jon S. Scoles's Report and Recommendation (docket no. 193). The time to object to the Report and Recommendation has expired. Defendant Michael Hubbard has not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation. Defendant has thus waived his right to de novo review of the Report and Recommendation. See, e.g., United States v. Rodriguez, 484 F.3d 1006, 1010-11 (8th Cir. 2007) ("[Defendant's] `failure to file any objections waived his right to de novo review by the district court of any portion of the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge as well as his right to appeal from the findings of fact therein.'" (quoting United States v. Newton, 259 F.3d 964, 966 (8th Cir. 2001)). The court finds no plain error in Judge Scoles's decision. Accordingly, the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (docket no. 193).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Hubbard

United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Cedar Rapids Division
Jun 21, 2010
No. 94-CR-19-LRR (N.D. Iowa Jun. 21, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Hubbard

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL HUBBARD, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Cedar Rapids Division

Date published: Jun 21, 2010

Citations

No. 94-CR-19-LRR (N.D. Iowa Jun. 21, 2010)