From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Holle

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Jul 25, 2008
8:08CR2 (D. Neb. Jul. 25, 2008)

Opinion

8:08CR2.

July 25, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the court on the motion to continue trial by defendant Joshua Holle (Filing No. 27). Holle seeks a continuance of sixty days of the trial of this matter which is scheduled for August 5, 2008. Holle's counsel represents Holle will file an affidavit wherein he represents that he understands the additional time may be excludable time for the purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. Holle's counsel represents that government's counsel and counsel for Tana Holle have no objection to the motion. Upon consideration, the motion will be granted.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Holle's motion to continue trial (Filing No. 27) is granted.

2. Trial of this matter is re-scheduled for 1:30 p.m. on October 28, 2008, before the undersigned magistrate judge and a jury. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between July 25, 2008 and October 28, 2008, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason that defendants' counsel require additional time to adequately prepare the case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) (B).


Summaries of

U.S. v. Holle

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Jul 25, 2008
8:08CR2 (D. Neb. Jul. 25, 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Holle

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. TANA HOLLE and JOSHUA HOLLE…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Jul 25, 2008

Citations

8:08CR2 (D. Neb. Jul. 25, 2008)