From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Higuera-Perez

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division
Oct 2, 2006
NO. 9:06-CR-34 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 2, 2006)

Opinion

NO. 9:06-CR-34.

October 2, 2006


FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION ON GUILTY PLEA BEFORE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this matter was referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge to receive defendant's guilty plea.

On September 29, 2006, defendant, defendant's counsel, and the government came before the court for guilty plea and allocution on Count I of the Indictment filed herein, charging a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). After conducting proceedings in the form and manner prescribed by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the undersigned finds:

(1) Defendant, after consultation with counsel of record, knowingly and voluntarily consents to pleading guilty before a United States magistrate judge, subject to final approval and imposition of sentence by the district judge to whom this case is assigned.

(2) Defendant is fully competent and capable of entering an informed plea, is aware of the nature of the charges and the consequences of the plea, and the plea of guilty is a knowing and voluntary plea supported by an independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of the offense.

(3) Defendant's plea is made pursuant to a plea agreement, a copy of which was produced for inspection and filed in the record. The plea agreement is of the type specified in FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(c)(1)(A), in that the government agrees (1) to not bring, or move to dismiss, other charges and (2) that particular provisions of the Sentencing Guidelines and sentencing factors apply.

(4) Defendant was advised that the court would defer its decision as to acceptance or rejection of the plea agreement until there has been an opportunity to consider the presentence report.

(5) Defendant was advised that if the court chooses not to follow the terms of the plea agreement, the court will give defendant an opportunity to withdraw the plea of guilty. Defendant was further advised that if defendant were to then choose not to withdraw the plea of guilty, the court may dispose of the case less favorably toward the defendant than the plea agreement contemplated.

RECOMMENDATION

Defendant's guilty plea should be conditionally accepted. The court should defer its decision as to acceptance or rejection of the plea agreement until it has an opportunity to consider the presentence report. If the court ultimately decides to accept the plea agreement, defendant should be adjudged guilty of the offense to which he has pleaded guilty.

28 U.S.C. § 636 normally gives parties ten days to object to recommendations submitted by a magistrate judge. However, as this recommendation is agreed, the court need not wait ten days before adopting such recommendation.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Higuera-Perez

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division
Oct 2, 2006
NO. 9:06-CR-34 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 2, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Higuera-Perez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RAUL HIGUERA-PEREZ

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division

Date published: Oct 2, 2006

Citations

NO. 9:06-CR-34 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 2, 2006)