From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Hartsock

United States District Court, D. Maine
Mar 19, 2003
Civil No. 02-60-B-S (D. Me. Mar. 19, 2003)

Opinion

Civil No. 02-60-B-S

March 19, 2003

Michael D. Love, Bangor, Me, for Plaintiff.

Walter F. Mckee, Lipman, Katz Mckee, Augusta, Me for Defendant.


ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE


The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on January 30, 2003 her Recommended Decision. The Government filed its objections to the Recommended Decision on March 4, 2003 and Defendant filed his response to those objections on March 18, 2003. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in her Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

I decline to consider the affidavit filed by the Government in it's objection to the Recommended Decision.

1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.

2. The conviction offered by the United States in support of its § 921(a)(33)(b)(i) obligation is deemed inadmissible because the United States has failed as a matter of law to generate sufficient evidence that the defendant intelligently and knowingly waived his right to counsel.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Hartsock

United States District Court, D. Maine
Mar 19, 2003
Civil No. 02-60-B-S (D. Me. Mar. 19, 2003)
Case details for

U.S. v. Hartsock

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. WILLARD HARTSOCK, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Maine

Date published: Mar 19, 2003

Citations

Civil No. 02-60-B-S (D. Me. Mar. 19, 2003)