Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

U.S. v. Harloff

826 F. Supp. 675 (W.D.N.Y. 1993)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
U.S. v. Harloff

1 Citing case

  1. United States v. Frazier

    465 F. Supp. 3d 791 (M.D. Tenn. 2020)   Cited 3 times

    II. Defendants cite United States v. Harloff, 826 F. Supp. 675 (W.D.N.Y. 1993) and United States v. Badalamenti, 626 F. Supp. 655 (S.D.N.Y. 1985) for the proposition that "there is no legal basis for requiring the return of Jencks materials once it has been disclosed." (Doc. No. 1592 at 7).