From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Halley

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 26, 2010
362 F. App'x 369 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

Nos. 08-6798, 08-6851.

Submitted: January 19, 2010.

Decided: January 26, 2010.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:89-cr-00115-jct-1).

Deryck Lennox Halley, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.


Dismissed in part; affirmed in part by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


In Appeal No. 08-6798, Deryck Lennox Halley appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). In Appeal No. 08-6851, Halley appeals the district court's subsequently filed amended judgment denying the same motion. The two appeals have been consolidated. Because the district court's amended judgment supersedes the court's previous order denying Halley's § 3582(c)(2) motion, we dismiss Halley's appeal of the previous order as moot.

With respect to Halley's appeal of the district court's amended judgment, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Halley, No. 7:89-cr-00115-jct-1 (W.D.Va. May 13, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Halley

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 26, 2010
362 F. App'x 369 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Halley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Deryck Lennox HALLEY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jan 26, 2010

Citations

362 F. App'x 369 (4th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Crouch v. City of Hyattsville

(ECF No. 82) (emphasis added). Furthermore, Plaintiff's cited case in support of this argument is inapposite,…