U.S. v. Hall

5 Citing cases

  1. Hall v. United States

    No: 3:05-cr-129 (E.D. Tenn. Sep. 10, 2012)

    His sentence was affirmed on direct appeal. United States v. Hall, 279 F. App'x 359 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 555 U.S. 936 (2008). The Sixth Circuit summarized the facts of the offense, as taken from the Presentence Investigation Report, as follows:

  2. Hall v. United States

    555 U.S. 936 (2008)

    Jonathan Matthew HALL, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.Case below, 279 Fed.Appx. 359. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

  3. Howard v. United States

    743 F.3d 459 (6th Cir. 2014)   Cited 31 times
    Finding no deficient performance

    And since then, a “steady stream of our caselaw” has reaffirmed this holding. United States v. Hall, 279 Fed.Appx. 359, 367 (6th Cir.2008); see also id. at 368 (collecting cases). But these decisions do not necessarily answer the main question in this case: was Howard's placement at Glen Mills the result of an adjudication of guilt and a sentence to confinement?

  4. U.S. v. Thompson

    586 F.3d 1035 (6th Cir. 2009)   Cited 10 times

    This Court has directly and indirectly addressed the issue of whether a juvenile sentence of confinement is counted in a defendant's criminal history score under USSG § 4A1.1 (e) on at least three occasions. United States v. Hanley, 906 F.2d 1116 (6th Cir. 1990); United States v. Kirby, 893 F.2d 867 (6th Cir. 1990) (per curiam); and United States v. Hall, 279 Fed.Appx. 359 (6th Cir. 2008) (unpublished opinion). Thompson attempts to distinguish Hanley by stating that the question in Hanley was whether commitment for a juvenile offense constitutes "imprisonment" under USSG § 4A1.2(d), not whether juvenile commitments are included under § 4A1.1(e) for the two-point enhancement.

  5. Morales v. U.S.

    Case Nos. 1:05-cv-354/1:04-cr-72 (E.D. Tenn. May. 1, 2009)   Cited 1 times

    The use of Morales' juvenile criminal adjudications under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(d) was not an error. United States v. Hall, 279 Fed. Appx. 359, 367-68 (6th Cir. 2008); Phillips v. United States, 238 Fed. Appx. 89, 94 (6th Cir. 2007); United States v. Williams, 176 F.3d 301, 311-12 (6th Cir. 1999); United States v. Hanley, 906 F.2d 1116, 1120 (6th Cir. 1990); United States v. Kirby, 893 F.2d 867, 868 (6th Cir. 1990). The Court has reviewed the PSR and the use of the juvenile criminal adjudications to calculate his points and criminal history category under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(d).