From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Guzman

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jan 14, 2010
09-CR-234 (JMR/SRN) (D. Minn. Jan. 14, 2010)

Opinion

09-CR-234 (JMR/SRN).

January 14, 2010


ORDER


Each defendant objects to the Report and Recommendation, issued November 25, 2009 [Docket No. 91], by the Honorable Susan R. Nelson, United States Magistrate Judge. The Report recommended denying defendants' motions for severance and suppression of evidence. Defendants' objections to the Report were timely filed, pursuant to Local Rule 72.2.

Based upon a de novo review of the record herein, the Court adopts the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Defendant Martinez Guzman's Motion to Suppress Evidence is denied [Docket No. 47].

2. Defendant Martinez Guzman's Motion to Sever Counts and Defendants is denied [Docket No. 49].

3. Defendant Martinez Guzman's Motion to Suppress Statements, Admissions and Answers is denied [Docket No. 50].

4. Defendant Medina-Medina's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained as a Result of Search and Seizure is denied [Docket No. 53].

5. Defendant Medina-Medina's Motion for Severance of Counts and Defendants is denied [Docket No. 54].

6. Defendant Medina-Medina's Motion for Severance of Defendants is denied [Docket No. 68].


Summaries of

U.S. v. Guzman

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jan 14, 2010
09-CR-234 (JMR/SRN) (D. Minn. Jan. 14, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Guzman

Case Details

Full title:United States of America v. Sylvestre Martinez Guzman (01) and Amaury…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Jan 14, 2010

Citations

09-CR-234 (JMR/SRN) (D. Minn. Jan. 14, 2010)

Citing Cases

United States v. Mays

Multiple cases in this district support the conclusion that a motion for a Franks hearing is non-dispositive.…