From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Geary

United States District Court, D. Hawaii
Nov 30, 2006
CIVIL 05-00135 DAE-BMK (D. Haw. Nov. 30, 2006)

Summary

holding that a contempt motion for alleged discovery abuses is dispositive if it involves a final determination of a claim being litigated.

Summary of this case from Hall v. Schumacher

Opinion

CIVIL 05-00135 DAE-BMK.

November 30, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION


Findings and Recommendation having been filed and served on all parties on November 13, 2006, and no objections having been filed by any party,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.2, the "Findings and Recommendation to Deny Respondents' Motion to Dismiss Contempt Proceeding," are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Geary

United States District Court, D. Hawaii
Nov 30, 2006
CIVIL 05-00135 DAE-BMK (D. Haw. Nov. 30, 2006)

holding that a contempt motion for alleged discovery abuses is dispositive if it involves a final determination of a claim being litigated.

Summary of this case from Hall v. Schumacher
Case details for

U.S. v. Geary

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. TIM J. GEARY and JOAN GEARY…

Court:United States District Court, D. Hawaii

Date published: Nov 30, 2006

Citations

CIVIL 05-00135 DAE-BMK (D. Haw. Nov. 30, 2006)

Citing Cases

Hall v. Schumacher

Further, the present counter-motion for contempt/sanctions (#50), purportedly filed in support of plaintiff's…