From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Galvan-Duque

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Feb 15, 2007
8:06CR312 (D. Neb. Feb. 15, 2007)

Opinion

8:06CR312.

February 15, 2007


ORDER


This matter is before the court on the motion to continue by defendant Martimiano Tamayo (Tamayo) (Filing No. 74). Tamayo seeks a continuance of the trial of this matter which is scheduled for February 26, 2007. Tamayo's counsel represents that counsel for the government has no objection to the motion. Tamayo's counsel represents that Tamayo consents to the motion and Tamayo will file an affidavit wherein he acknowledges he understands the additional time may be excludable time for the purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. Upon consideration, the motion will be granted. Trial will be continued as to all defendants awaiting trial.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Tamayo's motion to continue trial (Filing No. 74) is granted.

2. Trial of this matter as to all defendants is re-scheduled for April 16, 2007, before Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and a jury. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between February 15, 2007 and April 16, 2007, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason that defendants' counsel require additional time to adequately prepare the case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) (B).


Summaries of

U.S. v. Galvan-Duque

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Feb 15, 2007
8:06CR312 (D. Neb. Feb. 15, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Galvan-Duque

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JAVIER GALVAN-DUQUE and MARTIMIANO…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Feb 15, 2007

Citations

8:06CR312 (D. Neb. Feb. 15, 2007)