From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Foster

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 12, 2010
401 F. App'x 780 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-8072.

Submitted: October 21, 2010.

Decided: November 12, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:03-cr-00319-F-1).

Nathan Lee Foster, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Nathan Lee Foster appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Foster, No. 5:03-cr-00319-F-1 (E.D.N.C. July 17, 2009). We deny Foster's motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Foster

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 12, 2010
401 F. App'x 780 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Foster

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nathan Lee FOSTER, a/k/a…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Nov 12, 2010

Citations

401 F. App'x 780 (4th Cir. 2010)