From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Fiorini

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton
Oct 2, 2006
Case No. 1:03-cr-068 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 2, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 1:03-cr-068.

October 2, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #131), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) expired on September 27, 2006, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for relief under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) (Doc. No. 130) be, and it hereby is, denied for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Fiorini

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton
Oct 2, 2006
Case No. 1:03-cr-068 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 2, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Fiorini

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE J. FIORINI, II, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton

Date published: Oct 2, 2006

Citations

Case No. 1:03-cr-068 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 2, 2006)