From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. EIGHT THOUSAND FIVE H. TWENTY FIVE DOL

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Sep 30, 2010
Case No. 1:09-cv-679 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 30, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 1:09-cv-679.

September 30, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed September 7, 2010 (Doc. 28).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, we find the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation correct.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Herbert Williams' verified claim and answer are STRICKEN pursuant to 37(b)(2)(A) and for failure to prosecute his claim. Default judgment is entered in favor of the United States against claimant Herbert Williams in the amount of Eight Thousand Five Hundred Twenty Five Dollars (8,525).

Date: September 30, 2010


Summaries of

U.S. v. EIGHT THOUSAND FIVE H. TWENTY FIVE DOL

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Sep 30, 2010
Case No. 1:09-cv-679 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 30, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. EIGHT THOUSAND FIVE H. TWENTY FIVE DOL

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff v. Eight Thousand Five Hundred Twenty…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Sep 30, 2010

Citations

Case No. 1:09-cv-679 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 30, 2010)