From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. EADS

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Jul 11, 2007
8:07CR148 (D. Neb. Jul. 11, 2007)

Opinion

8:07CR148.

July 11, 2007


ORDER


This matter is before the court on the motion to continue by defendant Louis Eads (Eads) (Filing No. 18). Eads seeks to extend the pretrial motion deadline and to continue trial. Since Eads has obtained new counsel, the court finds the motion should be granted. Eads has filed an affidavit consenting to the motion and acknowledging the time required by his motion would be excludable time under the Speedy Trial Act.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Eads' motion to continue trial (Filing No. 18) is granted.

2. Eads is given until on or before July 31, 2007, in which to file pretrial motions pursuant to the progression order (Filing No. 8). The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between July 11, 2007 and July 31, 2007, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel requires additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) (B).

3. Trial of this matter will be rescheduled following the disposition of any pretrial motions.


Summaries of

U.S. v. EADS

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Jul 11, 2007
8:07CR148 (D. Neb. Jul. 11, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. EADS

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LOUIS EADS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Jul 11, 2007

Citations

8:07CR148 (D. Neb. Jul. 11, 2007)