From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. EADS

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
May 30, 2007
8:07CR148 (D. Neb. May. 30, 2007)

Opinion

8:07CR148.

May 30, 2007


ORDER


This matter is before the court on the motion for an extension of time by defendant Louis Eads (Eads) (Filing No. 12). Eads seeks until June 12, 2007, in which to file pretrial motions in accordance with the progression order (Filing No. 8). Eads' counsel represents that Eads will file an affidavit wherein he consents to the motion and acknowledges he understands the additional time may be excludable time for the purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. Upon consideration, the motion will be granted

IT IS ORDERED:

Defendant Eads' motion for an extension of time (Filing No. 12) is granted. Eads is given until on or before June 12, 2007, in which to file pretrial motions pursuant to the progression order. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between May 30, 2007 and June 12, 2007, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel requires additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) (B).


Summaries of

U.S. v. EADS

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
May 30, 2007
8:07CR148 (D. Neb. May. 30, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. EADS

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LOUIS EADS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: May 30, 2007

Citations

8:07CR148 (D. Neb. May. 30, 2007)