From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Durrani

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 25, 2009
320 F. App'x 585 (9th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-50007.

Submitted March 18, 2009.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed March 25, 2009.

William P. Cole, Esq., USSD-Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Arif Ali Durrani, Adelanto, CA, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-05-01746-LAB-1.

Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Arif Ali Durrani appeals pro se from a notice of document discrepancies, in which the district court rejected his motion for a new trial. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction because the district court's rejection of Durrani's motion was not a final order. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; see also Nat'l Distribution Agency v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co., 117 F.3d 432, 433-34 (9th Cir. 1997).

We decline to address Durrani's remaining contentions.

Durrani's motion for judicial notice is denied. See Fed.R.Evid. 201(b).

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Durrani

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 25, 2009
320 F. App'x 585 (9th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Durrani

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arif Ali DURRANI…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 25, 2009

Citations

320 F. App'x 585 (9th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Dunsmore v. Eldridge

It is not clear to the Court that this order is appealable. See United States v. Durrani, 320 F. App'x 585…