From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Diaz-Ramos

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Page 439
Dec 29, 2008
305 F. App'x 438 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-30051.

Submitted December 17, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed December 29, 2008.

James P. Hagarty, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Yakima, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Nicholas W. Marchi, Carney Marchi, PS, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, Edward F. Shea, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-06-02153-EFS.

Before: GOODWIN, TROTT, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Jose Guadalupe Diaz-Ramos appeals from the district court's denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Diaz-Ramos was indicted for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the district court erred when it denied his motion to dismiss because he was previously deported under an incorrect alien number which invalidated his prior deportation. Because Diaz-Ramos did not suffer prejudice as a result of being deported under an incorrect number, his contention fails. See United States v. Muro-Inclan, 249 F.3d 1180, 1185 (9th Cir. 2001).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Diaz-Ramos

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Page 439
Dec 29, 2008
305 F. App'x 438 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Diaz-Ramos

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Guadalupe…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Page 439

Date published: Dec 29, 2008

Citations

305 F. App'x 438 (9th Cir. 2008)