U.S. v. Davis

3 Citing cases

  1. Davis v. United States

    No. 1:12-CV-329-CLC (E.D. Tenn. Oct. 27, 2015)

    Petitioner filed a notice of appeal on January 31, 2008 [Docs. 254, 286], arguing the "plea colloquy was so misleading" that "he was unaware . . . pleading guilty would mean spending his entire life in prison." United States v. Davis, 422 F. App'x 445, 446 (6th Cir. 2011).

  2. Hearn v. Warden, Belmont Cnty. Corr. Inst.

    2:22-cv-2916 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 14, 2023)   Cited 1 times

    Under these facts, Petitioner has not established that his plea was unknowing, or that he would not have entered his plea but for misleading statements by the trial court. See United States v. Davis, 422 Fed.Appx. 445, 449 (6th Cir. 2011) (a petitioner is not entitled to relief absent a showing of a “reasonable probability that, but for the error, he would not have entered the plea”) (citing United States v. Dominguez Benitez, 542 U.S. 74, 83 (2004)).

  3. Porterfield v. McConahay

    4:21-CV-02401-SL (N.D. Ohio Aug. 4, 2023)

    ” Myers v. Warden, Warren Corr. Inst., No. 1:10-CV-343, 2011 WL 7039933, at *9 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 9, 2011), report and recommendation adopted, No. 1:10CV0343 WOB-SKB, 2012 WL 122568 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 17, 2012) quoting United States v. Davis, No. 08-6173, 2011 WL 1754082, at *4 (6th Cir. May 10, 2011). This Court's decision in Crangle is also instructive.