From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Copeland

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 3, 2010
368 F. App'x 461 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-7756.

Submitted: February 16, 2010.

Decided: March 3, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:00-cr-00424-PJM-15).

Cleveland Darnell Copeland, Appellant Pro Se. John Walter Sippel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Cleveland Darnell Copeland appeals the district court's denial of his motions for reduction of sentence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Copeland, No. 8:00-cr-00424-PJM-15 (D.Md. Aug. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Copeland

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 3, 2010
368 F. App'x 461 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Copeland

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cleveland Darnell…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Mar 3, 2010

Citations

368 F. App'x 461 (4th Cir. 2010)