From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Combs

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 11, 2005
412 F.3d 1020 (9th Cir. 2005)

Summary

amending prior opinion

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Combs

Opinion

Nos. 03-30456, CR-02-00108-1-JKS.

Submitted July 8, 2004.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed January 11, 2005. Amended June 16, 2005.

Lance C. Wells, Anchorage, Alaska, for the appellant.

Jo Ann Farrington, Assistant United States Attorney, Anchorage, Alaska, for the appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska, James K. Singleton, Chief Judge, Presiding.

Before HALL, KLEINFELD, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.



ORDER

The opinion filed January 11, 2005 is amended as follows:

1) Page 406: Delete the sentence beginning, "Because there was no . . ." and replace with "Because there was no Fourth Amendment violation, we affirm Combs' conviction, but we issue a limited remand as to Combs' claim of Sixth Amendment sentencing error. See United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir. 2005) (en banc)."

2) Delete the current Section III and add a new Section III as follows:

III.

Our original opinion did not address Combs' assertion of Sixth Amendment error. Because Combs did not challenge his sentence on Sixth Amendment grounds in the district court, we grant a "limited remand" pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir. 2005) (en banc).

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

With these amendments, Combs' petition for rehearing is DENIED as moot.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Combs

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 11, 2005
412 F.3d 1020 (9th Cir. 2005)

amending prior opinion

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Combs
Case details for

U.S. v. Combs

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert F. COMBS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 11, 2005

Citations

412 F.3d 1020 (9th Cir. 2005)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Combs

We therefore amended our opinion to include a remand to the district court for a determination of whether the…

U.S. v. Harwell

For purposes of constitutional reasonableness and § 3109, the preferred method for officers to enter a home…