From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Claus

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Nov 1, 2010
Criminal No. 10-165(1)(2) (DSD/JJK) (D. Minn. Nov. 1, 2010)

Opinion

Criminal No. 10-165(1)(2) (DSD/JJK).

November 1, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the court upon the objections of defendant Gayle Deann Claus (Claus) to the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes. On October 13, 2010, the magistrate judge recommended denial of the motion for severance by all defendants and the motion to dismiss counts 1 and 12 — 16 of the superseding indictment by Claus. Claus objects.

Defendants Nathan Daniel Jesh (Jesh) and Stacie Marie Ott (Ott) join in the motion for severance. Jesh did not file separate objections to the report and recommendation. Ott pleaded guilty on October 22, 2010, and therefore, her motion is moot.

The court reviews the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c)). After a de novo review of the file, record and proceedings herein, including in camera review of the government's documents at issue in Claus's motion for severance, the court finds that the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge is well reasoned and correctly disposes of the motions. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Claus's objections to the report and recommendation [Doc. No. 132] are overruled; and

2. The report and recommendation [Doc. No. 130] is adopted in its entirety.

Dated: November 1, 2010


Summaries of

U.S. v. Claus

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Nov 1, 2010
Criminal No. 10-165(1)(2) (DSD/JJK) (D. Minn. Nov. 1, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Claus

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Gayle Deann Claus and Nathan…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Nov 1, 2010

Citations

Criminal No. 10-165(1)(2) (DSD/JJK) (D. Minn. Nov. 1, 2010)