From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Clark

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Oct 31, 2006
218 F. App'x 981 (11th Cir. 2006)

Summary

holding that the district court lacked authority to compel government to file another motion to reduce sentence based on substantial post-sentencing assistance, where defendant, in alleging that government breached plea agreement by failing to set forth full extent of his cooperation in its substantial assistance motion, did not allege that government's failure was based on an unconstitutional motive.

Summary of this case from Keyes v. U.S.

Opinion

No. 05-13321.

October 31, 2006.

Appeal from the S.D.Fla., 183 Fed.Appx. 907.


Denial of Rehearing En Banc.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Clark

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Oct 31, 2006
218 F. App'x 981 (11th Cir. 2006)

holding that the district court lacked authority to compel government to file another motion to reduce sentence based on substantial post-sentencing assistance, where defendant, in alleging that government breached plea agreement by failing to set forth full extent of his cooperation in its substantial assistance motion, did not allege that government's failure was based on an unconstitutional motive.

Summary of this case from Keyes v. U.S.
Case details for

U.S. v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:U.S. v. Clark

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Oct 31, 2006

Citations

218 F. App'x 981 (11th Cir. 2006)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Dortch

(Doc. 38 at 7). United States v. Morales, 239 Fed. Appx. 533, 535 (11th Cir. 2007) (internal quotes omitted);…

Keyes v. U.S.

Thus, the court finds that Keyes has not made the requisite showing that the government's motive for not…