From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Christenson

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Sep 27, 2005
424 F.3d 852 (8th Cir. 2005)

Summary

affirming seventy-five percent downward departure

Summary of this case from U.S.A. v. Burns

Opinion

No. 04-2084.

September 27, 2005.

Richard L. Murphy, AUSA, argued, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, for appellant.

John P. Messina, AFPD, argued, Des Moines, Iowa, for appellee.

Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, BEAM, ARNOLD, MURPHY, BYE, RILEY, MELLOY, SMITH, COLLOTON, GRUENDER and BENTON, Circuit Judges, en banc.


ORDER

On rehearing en banc, the district court's judgment is affirmed by vote of an equally divided court.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Christenson

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Sep 27, 2005
424 F.3d 852 (8th Cir. 2005)

affirming seventy-five percent downward departure

Summary of this case from U.S.A. v. Burns
Case details for

U.S. v. Christenson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. Penny Jillean…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Sep 27, 2005

Citations

424 F.3d 852 (8th Cir. 2005)

Citing Cases

U.S.A. v. Burns

Any district judge aware of these cases would discern that our court only rarely affirms a sentence exceeding…

U.S. v. Saenz

A fourth panel opinion, United States v. Christenson, 403 F.3d 1006 (8th Cir. 2005), was vacated, and the…