From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Campbell

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 29, 2003
75 F. App'x 584 (9th Cir. 2003)

Opinion

Argued and Submitted August 13, 2003.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska; H. Russel Holland, Chief Judge, Presiding.

Richard L. Pomeroy, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Anchorage, AK, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Christine S. Schleuss, Friedman, Rubin & White, Anchorage, AK, for Defendant-Appellant.


Before PREGERSON, CANBY, and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Because the district court ordered restitution separately from probation and, on remand, considered specific factors as required under the Victim and Witness Protection Act (VWPA), we conclude that the district court ordered restitution under the VWPA. Under the VWPA, Campbell's obligation to pay restitution did not cease at

Page 585.

the end of her probationary period. 18 U.S.C. § 3579(f) (1986).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Campbell

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 29, 2003
75 F. App'x 584 (9th Cir. 2003)
Case details for

U.S. v. Campbell

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Sharyn G. CAMPBELL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 29, 2003

Citations

75 F. App'x 584 (9th Cir. 2003)