From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Campbell

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Beckley Division
Aug 31, 2007
Criminal Case No.: 5:05-00013 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 31, 2007)

Opinion

Criminal Case No.: 5:05-00013.

August 31, 2007


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


Defendant pled guilty to a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) for which he was sentenced to a term of sixty months of imprisonment. By Notice of Appeal filed on July 29, 2005, defendant appealed his sentence to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. While his appeal was pending, on December 7, 2005, defendant filed a "motion for relief from Judgment or Order pursuant to Rule 60(b)." (Doc. # 77). Defendant's sentence was affirmed by the Fourth Circuit on July 12, 2006. On February 26, 2007, defendant filed a habeas corpus action under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The § 2255 motion has not yet been decided.

Since filing the Rule 60(b) motion, defendant has also filed: 1) a motion for bond pending a ruling of that motion (Doc. # 80); 2) a motion to supplement his Rule 60(b) motion (Doc. # 93); 3) a motion for default judgment as to the Rule 60(b) motion (Doc. # 107); and 4) a motion to amend his Rule 60(b) motion (Doc. # 109).

Because there is no Rule 60(b) under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the court concludes that defendant's motion is filed pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

However, that rule applies only to civil cases. The only civil case in which defendant is a party is his § 2255 habeas corpus action. No judgment has been entered in that case as of the date of this Memorandum Opinion and Order. Accordingly, defendant's Rule 60(b) motion is misplaced and/or premature. Furthermore, to the extent defendant is attempting to set aside his criminal judgment, he has not stated any grounds that would permit this court to do so under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

For the reasons discussed above, defendant's motion under Rule 60(b) is DENIED (Doc. #77). The court also DENIES the motion for bond (Doc. # 80); the motion to supplement defendant's Rule 60(b) motion (Doc. # 93); the motion for default judgment as to the Rule 60(b) motion (Doc. # 107); and the motion to amend (Doc. # 109).

The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to counsel of record and to defendant.

It is SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Campbell

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Beckley Division
Aug 31, 2007
Criminal Case No.: 5:05-00013 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 31, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Campbell

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RICKY CAMPBELL

Court:United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Beckley Division

Date published: Aug 31, 2007

Citations

Criminal Case No.: 5:05-00013 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 31, 2007)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Campbell

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Campbell's motion to proceed…