From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Camacho-Parral

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Mar 11, 2008
8:07CR73 (D. Neb. Mar. 11, 2008)

Opinion

8:07CR73.

March 11, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the court on the motion for an extension of time by defendant Eugenio Camacho-Parral (Camacho-Parral) (Filing No. 27). Camacho-Parral seeks an additional twenty days in which to file pretrial motions in accordance with the progression order (Filing No. 21). Camacho-Parral has filed an affidavit wherein he consents to the motion and acknowledges he understands the additional time may be excludable time for the purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. Upon consideration, the motion will be granted.

IT IS ORDERED:

Defendant Camacho-Parral's motion for an extension of time (Filing No. 27) is granted. Camacho-Parral is given until on or before March 31, 2008, in which to file pretrial motions pursuant to the progression order. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between March 11, 2008 and March 31, 2008, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel requires additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) (B).


Summaries of

U.S. v. Camacho-Parral

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Mar 11, 2008
8:07CR73 (D. Neb. Mar. 11, 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Camacho-Parral

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. EUGENIO CAMACHO-PARRAL, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Mar 11, 2008

Citations

8:07CR73 (D. Neb. Mar. 11, 2008)