From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Brock

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville
Mar 15, 2007
No. 3:06-CR-73 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 15, 2007)

Opinion

No. 3:06-CR-73.

March 15, 2007


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


All pretrial motions in this case have been referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) for disposition or report and recommendation regarding disposition by the District Court as may be appropriate. This matter is before the Court for consideration of Defendant LaWanna Brock's Motion to Continue Trial [Doc. 69] filed March 13, 2007.

Defendant's Motion to Continue Trial [Doc. 69] requested a continuance due to a scheduling conflict of Wade Davies, Defendant's counsel. On March 15, 2007, Wade Davies informed the Court that said conflict no longer existed. Accordingly, Defendant filed a Motion to Withdraw the Motion to Continue [Doc. 70], stating that the scheduling conflict had been remedied and that no continuance was necessary at this time.

Therefore, Defendant's Motion to Withdraw Motion to Continue Trial [Doc. 70] is GRANTED and Defendant's Motion to Continue Trial [Doc. 69] is DENIED as moot. The trial will commence before the Honorable Thomas W. Phillips on April 10, 2007, at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Brock

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville
Mar 15, 2007
No. 3:06-CR-73 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 15, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Brock

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LAWANNA BROCK, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville

Date published: Mar 15, 2007

Citations

No. 3:06-CR-73 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 15, 2007)