From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Brill

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Aug 2, 2007
99-CR-0827 (NG) (CLP) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 2, 2007)

Opinion

99-CR-0827 (NG) (CLP).

August 2, 2007


ORDER


By Report and Recommendation (R R) of June 7, 2007, Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak has recommended that defendant Brill's motion to modify his restitution repayment schedule be denied in its entirety. I have carefully reviewed defendant's objections to the R R and now adopt it fully. Judge Pollak's decision is thorough and well-reasoned in every respect. It sensitively addresses the issues and accurately reflects the court's concerns at the time of sentencing that full restitution to the victims be assured. The motion is therefore denied.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Brill

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Aug 2, 2007
99-CR-0827 (NG) (CLP) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 2, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Brill

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. MARTIN BRILL, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Aug 2, 2007

Citations

99-CR-0827 (NG) (CLP) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 2, 2007)

Citing Cases

United States v. Musgrave

A defendant's spouse is not liable for any part of his restitution obligation, although her income may be…