From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Bradley

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Apr 19, 1999
188 F.3d 98 (3d Cir. 1999)

Opinion

Nos. 97-5462 and 97-5464.

Argued February 17, 1999.

Opinion filed April 19, 1999. Order Filed August 10, 1999.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. Crim. Nos. 96-00052-2 and 96-00052-1)

BEFORE: GREENBERG, ROTH, and LOURIE, Circuit Judges.

Honorable Alan D. Lourie, Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.


ORDER AMENDING OPINION


It is hereby ordered that the ninth word of the second sentence of the jury instruction which is quoted on pages 10 and 11 of the slip opinion in this case and published as United States v. Bradley, 173 F.3d 225, 231 (3d Cir. 1999), is amended to the end that "to" replaces "of" in the sentence. Thus, the sentence will read: "The public official need not fulfill the promise to the payor. . . ."


Summaries of

U.S. v. Bradley

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Apr 19, 1999
188 F.3d 98 (3d Cir. 1999)
Case details for

U.S. v. Bradley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WILLIAM F. BRADLEY, A/K/A FRANKLIN BRADLEY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Apr 19, 1999

Citations

188 F.3d 98 (3d Cir. 1999)

Citing Cases

United States v. Henon

We see no plain error. As the Supreme Court and this Court have explained, a quid pro quo agreement "need…