From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Birdsbill

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 19, 2007
228 F. App'x 742 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-30261.

Submitted April 16, 2007.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed April 19, 2007.

Craig W. Haller, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Mayo J. Ashley, Helena, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana, Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-05-00134-1-SEH.

Before: O'SCANNLAIN, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Royce Birdsbill, Sr. appeals from his jury conviction and 60-month sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Birdsbill's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. The Government did not file an answering brief.

Our independent review of the briefs and the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, all other pending motions are denied, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Birdsbill

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 19, 2007
228 F. App'x 742 (9th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Birdsbill

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Royce BIRDSBILL, Sr.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 19, 2007

Citations

228 F. App'x 742 (9th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Stoterau

Stoterau also argues that Abel testing is too unreliable to be reasonably related to the goals of supervised…

Figueroa v. State

See e.g., Carlson v. State, No. 01-98-00367-CR, 1999 WL 182445, at *1 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] April 1,…