From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Begay

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 4, 2010
591 F.3d 1180 (9th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 07-10487.

Filed January 4, 2010.

Ann Birmingham Scheel, Assistant U.S. Attorney, John Robert Lopez, USPX-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

James M. Wagstaffe, Esquire, Kerr Wagstaffe, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Daniel L. Kaplan, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FPDAZ-Federal Public Defender's Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.


ORDER


Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Begay

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 4, 2010
591 F.3d 1180 (9th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Begay

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenderick BEGAY, a.k.a…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 4, 2010

Citations

591 F.3d 1180 (9th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

United States v. Begay

We granted the government's petition for rehearing en banc. United States v. Begay, 591 F.3d 1180 (9th…

People v. Martinez

Aside from the fact that federal cases are not binding on this court on questions of federal constitutional…