From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Bassett

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Mar 4, 2010
Criminal No. 09-327 (1) (JRT/RLE) (D. Minn. Mar. 4, 2010)

Opinion

Criminal No. 09-327 (1) (JRT/RLE).

March 4, 2010

Christopher Wolfe, Assistant United States Attorneys, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Minneapolis, MN, for plaintiff.

Bruce Rivers, RIVERS ASSOCIATES, PA, Minneapolis, MN, for defendant.


ORDER


This matter is before the Court upon the defendant's motion to exclude the period of time from the date of this order through April 1, 2010 from the Speedy Trial Act computations in this case. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A), the Court finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. This finding is based on the facts set forth in the Defendant's Statement of Facts in Support of Exclusion of Time Under Speedy Trial Act and in the accompanying motion.

Based on all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1) The defendant's motion to exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act [Docket No. 62] is GRANTED.
2) The Change of Plea hearing is rescheduled to April 12, 2010 at 9:30 a.m. The time from the date of this order to the date the trial begins, or defendant enters a change of plea shall be excluded from the Speedy Trial Act computations in this case.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Bassett

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Mar 4, 2010
Criminal No. 09-327 (1) (JRT/RLE) (D. Minn. Mar. 4, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Bassett

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NATHAN DANIEL BASSETT, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Mar 4, 2010

Citations

Criminal No. 09-327 (1) (JRT/RLE) (D. Minn. Mar. 4, 2010)