From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Barnes

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
May 24, 2010
3:07cr132/MCR, 3:09cv290/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. May. 24, 2010)

Opinion

3:07cr105/MCR, 3:09cv289/MCR/MD.

May 24, 2010


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated April 22, 2010. The defendant previously has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto timely filed by the parties, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (doc. 54) is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is denied in this case.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Barnes

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
May 24, 2010
3:07cr132/MCR, 3:09cv290/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. May. 24, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Barnes

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HOLLY M. BARNES

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: May 24, 2010

Citations

3:07cr132/MCR, 3:09cv290/MCR/MD (N.D. Fla. May. 24, 2010)

Citing Cases

Shank v. United States

Therefore, Counsel in this case was not ineffective for failing to explore and present evidence on that…