From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Balbuena

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Jan 12, 2009
Case No. 8:08-CR-271-T-27TGW (M.D. Fla. Jan. 12, 2009)

Summary

ordering bond forfeiture where defendant violated conditions of pretrial release

Summary of this case from United States v. Steiner

Opinion

Case No. 8:08-CR-271-T-27TGW.

January 12, 2009


ORDER


BEFORE THE COURT is the Government's Motion for Declaration of Forfeiture Bond (Dkt. 127) and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation recommending that the motion be granted. (Dkt. 131). After careful consideration of Report and Recommendation in conjunction with an independent examination of the file, the Court is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 131) is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this order for all purposes, including appellate review.

2. The Government's Motion for Declaration of Forfeiture Bond (Dkt. 127) is GRANTED as set forth in the R R.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Balbuena

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Jan 12, 2009
Case No. 8:08-CR-271-T-27TGW (M.D. Fla. Jan. 12, 2009)

ordering bond forfeiture where defendant violated conditions of pretrial release

Summary of this case from United States v. Steiner
Case details for

U.S. v. Balbuena

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DIOGENES BALBUENA

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Jan 12, 2009

Citations

Case No. 8:08-CR-271-T-27TGW (M.D. Fla. Jan. 12, 2009)

Citing Cases

United States v. Thigpen

The authority of a Magistrate Judge to issue a final order regarding forfeiture of a bond is not settled. See…

United States v. Randolph

The authority of a Magistrate Judge to issue a final order regarding forfeiture of a bond is not settled. See…