From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Ardolf

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Sep 2, 2010
Criminal No. 10-159(1) (DWF/FLN) (D. Minn. Sep. 2, 2010)

Opinion

Criminal No. 10-159(1) (DWF/FLN).

September 2, 2010

Timothy C. Rank, Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, counsel for Plaintiff.

Seamus R. Mahoney, Esq., counsel for Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Based upon the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel dated August 13, 2010, all the files and records, and no objections having been filed to said Report and Recommendation,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of illegal stops, arrests and searches (Doc. No. [34]) is DENIED, and Defendant's motion to suppress confessions or statements in the nature of confessions (Doc. No. [35]) is DENIED.

Dated: September 2, 2010


Summaries of

U.S. v. Ardolf

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Sep 2, 2010
Criminal No. 10-159(1) (DWF/FLN) (D. Minn. Sep. 2, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Ardolf

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Barry Vincent Ardolf, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Sep 2, 2010

Citations

Criminal No. 10-159(1) (DWF/FLN) (D. Minn. Sep. 2, 2010)