From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Andrade-Casales

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 4, 2008
298 F. App'x 637 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-10086.

Submitted October 28, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed November 4, 2008.

Raynette M. Logan, U.S. Attorney's Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Gail Gianasi Natale, Esq., Law Office of Gail Gianasi Natale, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Ruben Andrade-Casales, Milan, NM, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Earl H. Carroll, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-06-00346-EHC.

Before: HAWKINS, RAWLINSON, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Ruben Andrade-Casales appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 63-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Andrade-Casales's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. A pro se supplemental brief and an answering brief have been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

All pending motions are DENIED. AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Andrade-Casales

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 4, 2008
298 F. App'x 637 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Andrade-Casales

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ruben ANDRADE-CASALES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 4, 2008

Citations

298 F. App'x 637 (9th Cir. 2008)