From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Anderson

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Jul 28, 2010
Case No. 3:07-cr-168 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 28, 2010)

Summary

In Anderson the court applied equitable tolling to an untimely § 2255 motion upon a showing of actual innocence of a SORNA violation.

Summary of this case from Logel v. U.S.

Opinion

Case No. 3:07-cr-168.

July 28, 2010


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #40), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Vacate be GRANTED and the Indictment herein DISMISSED with prejudice.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Anderson

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Jul 28, 2010
Case No. 3:07-cr-168 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 28, 2010)

In Anderson the court applied equitable tolling to an untimely § 2255 motion upon a showing of actual innocence of a SORNA violation.

Summary of this case from Logel v. U.S.
Case details for

U.S. v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES MACK ANDERSON, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Jul 28, 2010

Citations

Case No. 3:07-cr-168 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 28, 2010)

Citing Cases

Logel v. U.S.

s, 250 F.3d 1001, 1003 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1057 (2001); see also McSwain v. Davis, 287…