From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. Liab. Ins. Co. v. Scott

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Oct 17, 2012
No. 3:11-cv-01027 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 17, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:11-cv-01027

10-17-2012

UNITED STATES LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. JOE NATHAN SCOTT, JOE SCOTT d/b/a SCOTT'S MULTI-PURPOSE BUILDING, and CHARLES MARTIN, Defendants.


Judge Nixon

Magistrate Judge Bryant


ORDER

Pending before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Allow and Consider Defendants' Sur-Reply ("Motion") (Doc. No. 51), filed along with a Proposed Sur-Reply in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 51-1). Plaintiffs have filed a Response in Opposition to the Motion. (Doc. No. 55). In support of the Motion, Defendants state that the sur-reply "clears up alleged evidentiary issues" and may assist the Court in deciding the pending Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 35) in this matter. (Doc. No. 51.) The Court finds Defendants' request to be reasonable and therefore the Motion is GRANTED. The Court will consider the Proposed Sur-Reply (Doc. No. 51-1) when ruling on Plaintiff”s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc No. 35).

It is so ORDERED.

________

JOHN T. NIXON, SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

U.S. Liab. Ins. Co. v. Scott

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Oct 17, 2012
No. 3:11-cv-01027 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 17, 2012)
Case details for

U.S. Liab. Ins. Co. v. Scott

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. JOE NATHAN SCOTT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 17, 2012

Citations

No. 3:11-cv-01027 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 17, 2012)