Opinion
No. 3:11-cv-01027
10-17-2012
Judge Nixon
Magistrate Judge Bryant
ORDER
Pending before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Allow and Consider Defendants' Sur-Reply ("Motion") (Doc. No. 51), filed along with a Proposed Sur-Reply in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 51-1). Plaintiffs have filed a Response in Opposition to the Motion. (Doc. No. 55). In support of the Motion, Defendants state that the sur-reply "clears up alleged evidentiary issues" and may assist the Court in deciding the pending Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 35) in this matter. (Doc. No. 51.) The Court finds Defendants' request to be reasonable and therefore the Motion is GRANTED. The Court will consider the Proposed Sur-Reply (Doc. No. 51-1) when ruling on Plaintiff”s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc No. 35).
It is so ORDERED.
________
JOHN T. NIXON, SENIOR JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT