United States ex rel. TSI Tri-State Painting, LLC v. Fed. Ins. Co.

3 Citing cases

  1. Pace Constr. Servs. v. Fed. Ins. Co.

    2:23-CV-00197 (W.D. La. Sep. 27, 2024)

    In Miller Act litigation, a “Court should not exercise its power to stay proceedings lightly.” United States for Use & Benefit of TSI Tri-State Painting, LLC v. Fed. Ins. Co., No. CV 216-113, 2016 WL 7385715, at *4 (S.D. Ga. Dec. 20, 2016).

  2. Walker v. Morris

    Civil Action 2:22-cv-83 (S.D. Ga. Feb. 21, 2023)

    District courts also have broad discretion over whether to grant a stay “considering] its own interests in an orderly disposition of its caseload, and the parties' competing interests in the two actions.” United States for Use & Benefit of TSI Tri-State Painting, LLC v. Fed. Ins. Co., No. CV 216-113, 2016 WL 7385715, at *4 (S.D. Ga. Dec. 20, 2016) (citing Markel Int'l Ins. Co. v. O'Quinn, 566 F.Supp.2d 1374, 1376 (S.D. Ga. 2008)). Here, the Court declines Plaintiff's invitation to keep this case open with a stay while he also has at least three administrative grievances open with the prison. This would unnecessarily keep this case pending in the Court's docket for an indefinite amount of time while the administrative action may well resolve the dispute.

  3. United States ex rel. Dixie Commc'ns Sys.v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. of Am.

    CV 118-210 (S.D. Ga. Sep. 23, 2019)

    Similarly, the subcontract serves as the foundation of the present action, especially considering Plaintiff asserts a breach of contract claim. See United States ex rel. TSI Tri-State Painting, LLC v. Fed. Ins. Co., No. CV 216-113, 2016 WL 7385715, at *4 (S.D. Ga. Dec. 20, 2016). Moreover, Plaintiff references both the bill and the subcontract in its Complaint, and Moving Defendants do not dispute the authenticity of these documents.