From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. K.J. Enterprises, Inc.

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Jul 19, 1989
563 A.2d 1386 (Conn. App. Ct. 1989)

Opinion

(6466)

Argued June 7, 1989

Decision released July 19, 1989

Action to recover damages allegedly due under an indemnity agreement, and for other relief, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Hartford-New Britain at Hartford and tried to the court, Noren, J.; judgment for the plaintiff, from which the defendant Frank X. Lo Sacco appealed to this court. No error.

Frank X. Lo Sacco, pro se, the appellant (defendant).

Kirk D. Tavtigian, Jr., with whom were James J. Tancredi, and Susan J. Barnes, for the appellee (plaintiff).


The plaintiff instituted this action against the defendants for breach of an indemnity agreement and to set aside certain conveyances of property as fraudulent. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and an award of attorneys fees and expenses, the defendant has appealed.

The defendant raises ten claims of error on appeal that attack either the court's factual findings or its exercise of discretion. We have fully reviewed each of the defendant's claims and conclude that the court's findings are not clearly erroneous, and that its actions were clearly within its discretion. See Della Pietra v. American Factors, Inc., 18 Conn. App. 812, 556 A.2d 1064 (1989).


Summaries of

U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. K.J. Enterprises, Inc.

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Jul 19, 1989
563 A.2d 1386 (Conn. App. Ct. 1989)
Case details for

U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. K.J. Enterprises, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:U.S. FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY v. K.J. ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL

Court:Appellate Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jul 19, 1989

Citations

563 A.2d 1386 (Conn. App. Ct. 1989)
563 A.2d 1386

Citing Cases

U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. K.J. Enterprises

Decided September 27, 1989 The defendant Frank X. LoSacco's petition for certification for appeal from the…

Star Enterprise v. Hanna

The appellants have failed to demonstrate that the trial court's findings were clearly erroneous or that its…