From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Urquiaga v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 28, 1993
624 So. 2d 810 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

Nos. 93-769, 92-1156.

September 28, 1993.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Jeffrey Rosinek, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, N. Joseph Durant, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, and Julie M. Levitt, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Stephanie G. Kolman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.


Rafael Urquiaga appeals an order denying his motion to correct his sentence to conform to the sentencing judge's oral pronouncements. After review of the sentencing transcript, we agree with appellant that the orally announced sentence called for two concurrent three-year mandatory minimum sentences, not consecutive mandatory minimum sentences. The order under review is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to correct the sentencing order accordingly.

Reversed and remanded with directions.


Summaries of

Urquiaga v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 28, 1993
624 So. 2d 810 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Urquiaga v. State

Case Details

Full title:RAFAEL URQUIAGA, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 28, 1993

Citations

624 So. 2d 810 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Nodal v. State

We find no merit in any of the points raised by the defendant on appeal, save one. We conclude that the trial…