From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Uriostegui v. Foulk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 29, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-0151 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:13-cv-0151 EFB P

01-29-2013

DANIEL URIOSTEGUI, Petitioner, v. F. FOULK, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

Petitioner challenges a conviction in the Merced County Superior Court and so this action should have been commenced in the district court in Fresno. E.D. Cal. Local Rule 120(d).

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that:

1. This action is transferred to the district court in Fresno. See E.D. Cal. Local Rule 120(f).

2. The Clerk of Court shall assign a new case number.

3. All future filings shall bear the new case number and shall be filed at:

United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721

________________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Uriostegui v. Foulk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 29, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-0151 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2013)
Case details for

Uriostegui v. Foulk

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL URIOSTEGUI, Petitioner, v. F. FOULK, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 29, 2013

Citations

No. 2:13-cv-0151 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2013)